◢███◤      ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                            
     ◢██◤       ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                             
    ◢██◤       ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                              
   ◢██◤       ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                               
  ◢██◤       ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                                
◢███◤       ◢██◤                            ◢██◤                          ◥██◣   
◥███       ◢█████◣    ◢████████◤ ◢███████◤ ◢██◤ ◢██◤                 ◢██◤   ██◣  
 ███      ◢███████◣        ◢██◤ ◢██◤ ◢██◤ ◢███████◤                 ◢██◤    ███  
 ███     ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢████████◤ ◢██◤      ◢█████◣                   ◢██◤     ███  
 ███    ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢██◤  ███◤ ◢██◤ ◢██◤ ◢██◤◥███◣                 ◢██◤      ███  
 ◥██   ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢████████◤ ◢███████◤ ◢██◤  ◥███◣               ◢██◤       ███◣ 
  ◥██◣                                                          ◢██◤       ◢███◤ 
                                 ◢███◤ ◢███◤ ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢█████████◤       ◢██◤   
                                ◢█████████◤ ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢██◤  ████◤       ◢██◤    
                               ◢██◤◢█◤◢██◤ ◢██◤  ◢██◤ ◢██◤   ███◤       ◢██◤     
                              ◢██◤   ◢██◤ ◢████████◤ ◢█████████◤       ◢██◤      
                             ◢██◤   ◢██◤ ◢████████◤ ◢█████████◤      ◢███◤       

0004
[Feature Request] Reduce sys.specs between users
6gufzy
Each time the client is loaded and a user is selected for the first time, the display in the top right requests you to run `Lsys`.`5specs` && `Laccts`.`5balance` to show any info. This needs to be done for each user separately, and running 2 scripts for each can become tedious. My hope was to create a script that could call both in 1 run to make this process more efficient, but unfortunately `Lsys`.`5specs` && `Laccts`.`5balance` do not update the shell when called as a subscript. It seems the only way to do this is to run both manually. A way to make this work through subscripts would make the process much smoother across a large number of users. EDIT: Or possibly just having this info available automatically when you switch from a user that already has the display, that would save even more trouble. It would also avoid potentially exposing when a script is making those calls. On further consideration I think this would be preferable
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A way to make this work through subscripts would make the process much smoother across a large number of users.
flux
{240607.1818}
This specifically has already been ruled out by sean in k7og9g: https://hackmud.com/forums/bugs_features_ideas/_bug__running__s_sys_specs__ However, I strongly agree with this point:
EDIT: Or possibly just having this info available automatically when you switch from a user that already has the display, that would save even more trouble. It would also avoid potentially exposing when a script is making those calls. On further consideration I think this would be preferable
flux
{240607.1818}
I believe the display should be populated automatically upon switching users, instead of requiring sys.specs and accts.balance to be called every time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -